Definitions - The Solution to the Problem of the Definition of Art

The Tel Aviv New Dogma Through The Occam’s Razor Test:

A paradigm does not need to be elegant only reasonable.  However, when it does make sense, assessing its elegance relative to other theories is as simple as applying Occam’s Razor.  The Tel Aviv New Dogma needs only five definitions for theorising Art (Art, Artefact, Artist, Creator, Language), and six more for a correlating theory of Aesthetics (Good-Beauty, Bad-Ugly, High, Low, Groundbreaking, Important). 
Once the Artist is defined as the Viewer instead of the Artefact’s Creator, it becomes possible to separate the concepts of Artist and Creator. Consequently, Art can be defined more simply:
Art is the process of interpretation that affects (develops or impair) Language, whether Private-Language or Public-Language, relating to an Artefact. Artefact is anything, tangible or not, designed or declared as such to influence the self-aware being, whether emotionally, rationally, or by integrating the emotional with the rational. Artists are those who engage with the interpretation of an Artefact, whether self-made or made in another way.  Creators are those who create artefacts or declare something as an artefact. Creation is separated from interpretation in the sense that the Creator can be a craftsperson, a machine, AI, or Nature. The interpretation of an object as Art is what makes it Art.
Art, Science, and Real-Life are all tangents on the graph of causality and are distinguished by methodologies and focus: Real-Life focuses on navigating 
through life, Science focuses on laws of nature, and Art focuses on sophisticating Language, whether Private or Public. These tangents may overlap, intersect or go in parallel.  The Tel Aviv New Dogma, as a theory of Art, goes beyond the ..."

[The Book of the Tel Aviv New Dogma: Paradigm Shift of Art and Aesthetics Theories, "Definitions" pp 120-121, See the definitions of Art and Aesthetics in Amazon’s Read Sample ]