Postrelativism: Art Beyond the Era of Postrelativism

Abstract

The Tel Aviv New Dogma represents a groundbreaking shift in art theory, addressing both traditional and contemporary questions with innovative approaches. This article explores the Tel Aviv New Dogma's distinctiveness in relation to relativism and postrelativism. It examines how the theory redefines the roles of creators and viewers, approaches truth and aesthetics, and integrates contemporary technologies into artistic practice. By contrasting the Tel Aviv New Dogma with relativism's emphasis on subjective interpretation and postrelativism's search for structured frameworks, this article highlights the unique contributions of the Tel Aviv New Dogma to the evolving discourse on art.

 

Relativism, Postrelativism, and the Tel Aviv New Dogma

The Tel Aviv New Dogma is a revolutionary art theory that addresses both age-old questions and contemporary challenges with fresh perspectives. As technology evolves, fundamental inquiries into art's nature become increasingly significant. This theory explores essential questions such as: What is art? What constitutes truth in art? What determines artistic value? How does artistic value intersect with commercial value?

Emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, introduce new questions: Who qualifies as an artist? Can a machine with intelligence be recognized as an artist? The Tel Aviv New Dogma transcends theoretical discussion by providing a practical methodology that bridges the gap between theory and application.

 

About the Tel Aviv New Dogma in More Detail

The Tel Aviv New Dogma (TLVIV New Dogma) signifies a profound and innovative shift in our understanding of art. It offers a fresh perspective on the roles of creators and interpreters, and on the nature of truth and aesthetics in artistic practice. This new framework reimagines art as a process of interpretation that unfolds within the viewer's mind, introducing compelling concepts related to truth, aesthetics, and the impact of new technologies. Central to the TLVIV New Dogma is the assertion that art's role is to advance public language in a way that benefits humanity, science, and art itself. Its unifying nature allows it to serve as a versatile platform for any form of art or hybrid forms, integrating diverse artistic expressions into a cohesive framework.

Distinctions Between Creators and Artists
The TLVIV New Dogma makes a clear distinction between creators and artists. According to this doctrine, anyone involved in the production of an artifact—whether through physical creation, conceptualization, or execution—is classified as a creator. However, it is the viewer who assumes the role of the artist by engaging with and interpreting the artifact. This perspective shifts the focus from the creator’s intent to the interpretive engagement of the observer, emphasizing that the essence of art emerges through the viewer’s interaction with the artifact.

Truth in Art
The TLVIV New Dogma presents a nuanced approach to truth in art, aligning more with scientific paradigms than with relativism. It posits that the most accurate interpretation of an artifact represents the closest approximation to truth. While this truth is not viewed as absolute, it evolves with changing paradigms and contexts. The TLVIV New Dogma acknowledges that determining truth can be complex and that multiple, sometimes contradictory interpretations may coexist, reflecting the evolving nature of scientific understanding.

Aesthetic Values
According to the TLVIV New Dogma, groundbreaking art is defined by its capacity to explore entirely new dimensions of the undefined. Such art pushes the boundaries of public discourse and plays a crucial role in advancing public language, contributing significantly to human progress and scientific advancement. The doctrine views beauty as aligning with truth, asserting that art considered beautiful resonates with a deeper, more accurate understanding of truth, thus enhancing its value and significance. Conversely, art perceived as ugly is seen as introducing false values into the public language, potentially undermining its integrity. This perspective emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between art that enriches public language and art that undermines it.

Technological Integration
The TLVIV New Dogma's engagement with contemporary technological advancements is particularly noteworthy. It embraces technologies such as 3D printing, Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) as integral components of the artistic process. Rather than merely adapting to these changes, the doctrine utilizes them to explore and expand new artistic frontiers, ensuring its relevance and dynamism in an era of rapid technological development.

Evaluation of Artifacts
The TLVIV New Dogma adopts a broad and inclusive definition of artifacts, emphasizing that art is fundamentally a process of interpretation that takes place within the viewer's mind. According to this doctrine, the viewer, by engaging with and interpreting the artifact, assumes the role of the artist. This perspective highlights that while viewers may use personal or private language—employing terms in ways that differ from conventional meanings—the collective truth of art is decided by public consensus. Much like how the meanings of words in a dictionary evolve based on their public use, the truth and value of art are shaped by communal engagement and interpretation. Thus, the value of an artifact is assessed based on its contribution to public language and alignment with this collectively agreed-upon truth, rather than solely on its emotional impact or intensity. This approach offers a nuanced perspective on evaluating artistic works, integrating both individual interpretation and collective understanding.

 

 

Comparing the Tel Aviv New Dogma with Relativism and Postrelativism

New Relativism and Postrelativism
The term "postrelativism" used here refers to advanced forms of new relativism that address the criticisms of relativism more profoundly. Initially, postrelativism included references to art practices that emerged from relativism and inverted basic ethics, making good evil. However, these examples were later removed as they represented not problematic but bad forms of relativism, ultimately failing to contribute constructively to the discourse.

 

Foundation and Objectives:

• Relativism: Emphasizes the subjective nature of art and the fluidity of its meaning based on individual perspectives. It challenges universal standards and accepts multiple interpretations without a unified framework.
• Postrelativism: Aims to address relativism's limitations by integrating subjective insights with structured approaches, seeking common ground for evaluating and discussing art.
• Tel Aviv New Dogma: Introduces a novel approach by redefining the roles of creators and interpreters and integrating contemporary technologies. It aims to advance public language in ways that benefit humanity, science, and art, serving as a versatile platform for diverse artistic expressions.

Interpretation and Truth:

• Relativism: Asserts that truth in art is subjective and varies with each viewer's context. It denies universal truths, focusing instead on individual interpretations.
• Postrelativism: Accepts the subjectivity of interpretations but strives for a more coherent understanding of truth, incorporating evolving frameworks that accommodate multiple perspectives.
• Tel Aviv New Dogma: Shifts focus from creator intent to viewer interpretation. It aligns with scientific paradigms, positing that the most accurate interpretation approximates truth, acknowledging that truth evolves and multiple interpretations may coexist.

Aesthetic Values:

• Relativism: Allows for diverse aesthetic values based on personal and cultural perspectives. There is no universal standard for beauty or artistic significance.
• Postrelativism: Seeks to balance subjective tastes with a shared understanding of aesthetic value, facilitating discussions informed by both personal and collective perspectives.
• Tel Aviv New Dogma: Defines groundbreaking art by its capacity to explore new dimensions and advance public language. It links beauty with truth and views art perceived as ugly as potentially undermining public language.

Technological Integration:

• Relativism: Does not inherently address technological advancements in art, focusing primarily on the subjective nature of interpretation.
• Postrelativism: Acknowledges technological impacts but mainly within the context of integrating subjective insights into structured frameworks.
• Tel Aviv New Dogma: Actively embraces technologies such as 3D printing, VR, AR, and AI as integral to the artistic process, using them to explore and expand artistic frontiers.

Evaluation of Artifacts:

• Relativism: Evaluates art based on personal and cultural perspectives, accepting diverse interpretations without universal criteria.
• Postrelativism: Advocates for a nuanced evaluation that considers both subjective experiences and common standards for art assessment.
• Tel Aviv New Dogma: Art is viewed as a process of interpretation that unfolds within the viewer’s mind. The viewer, assuming the role of the artist, may use personal or private language, but the collective truth is decided by public consensus. Much like dictionary meanings evolve with public use, the value of an artifact is assessed based on its contribution to public language and alignment with this collectively agreed-upon truth. 

Summary

The Tel Aviv New Dogma represents a groundbreaking approach in art theory that distinguishes itself from both relativism and traditional notions of fixed standards. Unlike relativism, which emphasizes the subjective nature of artistic interpretation and accepts multiple, often conflicting perspectives, the Tel Aviv New Dogma seeks to establish a more coherent understanding of truth within the art world. It strives to achieve a form of factual truth that evolves with scientific paradigms, having in common the latest technological advancements and theoretical insights.

The Tel Aviv New Dogma acknowledges that truth in art is complex and can be approximated but not always definitively proven, as proved by Gödel's incompleteness theorems. Nevertheless, it goes far beyond the common features it shares with new relativism by pushing the boundaries of how art is conceived and evaluated. By redefining the roles of creators and viewers and integrating cutting-edge technologies such as 3D printing, VR, AR, and AI, it provides a dynamic and practical framework for evaluating art. This approach emphasizes the advancement of public language and human progress while striving for a more precise and nuanced understanding of truth, offering a distinctive contribution to contemporary art discourse that bridges subjective and objective.